Magoosh GRE

Strategic Analysis of Marks and Spencer (M&S) Group

| February 12, 2012 | 2 Comments

 

Abstract

Marks and Spencer Group is ranked 55 in terms of market capitalisation on the FTSE 100 as of close of  business on Friday 7th October 2011. This essay briefly touches on the key elements of Marks and Spencer’s existing and past strategies, exploring how specific resources have influenced strategies, and how these account for the company’s performance. A very brief analysis of the difficulties that the current strategy might possibly encounter in the future is included.

Methodology

Due to the time constraints for this assignment, research resources have focused primarily on those available  via the internet, with some textbook references added where available and relevant. Internet resources include  M&S news releases, media articles (BBC online, Financial Times, Guardian, Telegraph) and relevant academic papers that were readily available online, without requiring a subscription.

The analysis is based on Porter’s Five Forces model: Bargaining Power Of Suppliers; Bargaining Power Of Customers; Threat Of New Entrants; Threat Of Substitute Products; Competitive Rivalry Within An Industry

 

Introduction

Marks and Spencer Group is ranked 55 in terms of market capitalisation on the FTSE 100 as of close of business on Friday 7th October 2011.

At the turn of the millennium, M&S was hit by a major crisis, which lasted for several years. In May 2000 Chairman Luc Vandevelde announced a boardroom cull and forced the resignations of three executive directors. The dividend payable to shareholders was slashed for the first time in the 74 years for which M&S had been a public company.

By January 2001 the sales figures for the Christmas period revealed that M&S was the worst performing company of all the high street chains for the third year in a row. Profits and stock trading were both down (Left, 2001). The more recent recession has brought more problems for the company, as has been the case for the majority of high street retailers (Rayner, 2008). Robert Swannell became Chairman in January 2011.

 

Corporate Strategy Analysis: a Resource Based View

Initial Company Strategy

‘The brand is where the company’s identity lies’ (Kapferer, 1992, p31

The original strategy employed by M&S was to build its brand. The company’s resources included the St Michael logo, the policy of using mainly British suppliers, and good customer relations. Quality control was achieved by working closely with suppliers, and the M&S management system focused on a top-down approach that became standard in all stores. Customer satisfaction and loyalty was secured and there was steady growth in market share and profit until the 1990s, when competition at the top and bottom end of the market rendered this strategy obsolete.

 

Core Competencies

M&S core competencies resulted in the development of a strong brand, excellent quality control and good customer service. Pearson described a core competency as:

‘… a combination of capabilities such as advanced technologies and superior management skills, which provide a firm with a leadership position in the development of core products.’ (Pearson 1999, p170).

However the rigid management structure proved inflexible in changing market conditions: decisions and policies made at the top were not challenged.

 

A Move to Restructure

The top-down management approach caused M&S to become vulnerable to market changes so new resources were created, including a department with a remit to seek out new business opportunities; more autonomy for store managers; different procedures for buying. M&S began to look overseas for suppliers. Simon Marks’ management style was directly linked to this strategy.

Restructuring was designed to reposition M&S at the market’s core and to restore and enhance some of its key resources. The close working relationship between suppliers, employees, management and loyal customers was enhanced. New customers were attracted by campaigns featuring Twiggy and younger models – so M&S could widen the appeal of its clothing range.

 

Current Strategies

The techniques of broadening its appeal, responding to customer preferences and introducing new products in food and finance have assisted M&S towards recovery.

The development of the quality food market has been a particularly successful new resource. Using designers to create unique food areas M&S has continued to sustain consumer interest in its food range.

‘Marks and Spencer’s chief executive Marc Bolland is stepping up the battle for the upmarket food shopper, introducing delicatessens and bakeries as part of a £600m store overhaul. Mr Bolland revealed on Monday that £400m-£450m would be spent on the first phase of improvement, such as the changes to food.’ (Felsted, 2011 (a))

M&S plans to make continued investment in premises, specifically:

‘ … an overhaul of the high street bellwether’s stores, highlighting its in-house brands and revamping food operations. Mr Bolland said in May that he intended to spend hundreds of millions of pounds on M&S stores … ’ (Felsted, 2011 (b))

Also, M&S will develop its e-commerce operations:

‘In November 2010, Marks and Spencer Group announced plans ‘to grow our multi-channel ecommerce business both in the UK and internationally’, which was followed up by the appointment to the board of Laura Wade-Gery as Executive Director, Multi-channel E-commerce…’ (M&S Corporate Press Release, 2011).

Chief executive Mark Bolland believes future growth will come from international expansion, creating new products and rebuilding the company’s website.
Danger Sign

In today’s marketplace most M&S competitors are using the model of a ‘shop within a shop’ (Ognjenovic, 1980). Supermarkets have introduced ‘high quality’ food ranges, such as Sainsbury’s ‘Taste the Difference’ and now supply many other goods – others have developed inexpensive ranges of clothes with ‘designer labels’ – for example, George at Asda.

M&S has lost experienced staff:

‘Ms Lusher brings some 30 years of experience at M&S to Tesco. She has worked across all of the clothing areas, including womenswear, menswear, lingerie, childrenswear and accessories.’ (Felsted, 2011 (c))

Not all areas have been successful for M&S:

‘… general merchandise – clothing and homewares – was weaker, with same-store sales just 1.7 per cent higher.’ 3 (Barrett, 2011)

 

Proposed Future Strategies

Food: M&S should build on this resource. The ‘Dine In’ campaign has proved a winning response to the competition for quality food, so far. A higher profile for food should provide increased volume of sales.

Finance: discontinue chargecards. The M&S Credit Card can be used in other places.

E-commerce: further development needed. The in-store pick up (free of delivery charges) is attractive.

International expansion: proceed with caution. A second attempt to establish a successful store in Paris is planned this year.

Homewares: eliminate. Now being sold by a vast range of retailers – supermarkets, DIY stores, independent furniture shops and competitors Debenhams and Next.

 

Conclusion

In terms of determining the rate and level of success a business can achieve, relative to the market competition, strategy plays a major role. M&S developed along fixed lines for a lengthy period of time, however its original strategy became too cumbersome to cope with changing market forces. It now needs to recognise and retain those elements that work well for it and to continue to seek out innovative new resources for the future. Plans for expansion, especially into international markets, should be considered very carefully indeed.

Bibliography and Reference

Barrett, C., 2011. ‘M&S sets course to combat dull high street’. Financial Times. Online. July 13th. Available from: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/71d22ed8-ad25-11e0-a24e-00144feabdc0.html – axzz1arqwGrO3 [Accessed 15th October 2011.

BBC, 2009. ‘BUSINESS | Marks & Spencer profits top expectations’. BBC News. May 19th 1998. Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/96531.stm. [Accessed 16th October 2011].

Burdett, C., 2011. ‘Complementors’. Online. Available from:
http://www.clintburdett.com/process/05_research/research_05_3_complementors.htm [Accessed 15th October 2011].

Evans, M., 2011. ‘Excellence in Financial Management: Course 12: Competitive Intelligence (Part 2 of 2)’. Online. Available from: http://www.exinfm.com/training/pdfiles/course12-2.pdf [Accessed 15th October 2011].

FTSE All-Share Index Ranking (unofficial guide), 2011. Online. October 7th. Available from: http://www.stockchallenge.co.uk/ftse.php [Accessed 15th October 2011].

Felsted, A., 2011 (a). ‘M&S targets foodies with delicatessen counters’. Financial Times. Online. September 15th. Available from: http://markets.ft.com/research/Markets/Tearsheets/NewsSearchResultss=MKS:LSE&source=FTNews&dateRange_to=10%2f3%2f2011+6%3a03%3a28+PM&dateRange_from=&wsodIssue=201870&keyword=&sortByRelevance=False [Acessed 15th October 2011].

Felsted, A., 2011 (b). ‘Marks and Spencer plans overhaul of stores’. Financial Times. Online. September 9th. Available from: http://markets.ft.com/research/Markets/Tearsheets/NewsSearchResults?s=MKS:LSE&source=FTNews&dateRange_to=10%2f3%2f2011+6%3a03%3a28+PM&dateRange_from=&wsodIssue=201870&keyword=&sortByRelevance=False [Accessed 15th October 2011].
Felsted, A., 2011 (c). ‘Clarke shakes up Tesco’s clothing business’. Financial Times. Online. Available from: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c7bed82c-be7e-11e0-ab21-00144feabdc0.html – axzz1arqwGrO3 [Accessed 15th October 2011].

Harrison, D., 2011. ‘Retailers watch M&S’s plans for auto enrolment’. Financial Times. Online. September 4th. Available from: http://markets.ft.com/research/Markets/Tearsheets/NewsSearchResults?s=MKS:LSE&source=FTNews&dateRange_to=10%2f3%2f2011+6%3a03%3a28+PM&dateRange_from=&wsodIssue=201870&keyword=&sortByRelevance=False [Accessed 15th October 2011].

History of Marks and Spencer (2002), Sourced from the Marks and Spencer website April 2002. Available from: http://www.examstutor.com/business/resources/companyprofiles/marksandspencer/history.php [Accessed 16th October 2011].

Kapferer, J. 1992. Strategic brand management. London. Free Press.

Left, S., 2001. ‘The highs and lows of Marks & Spencer: M&S results ‘not good enough’’. The Guardian. January 23rd 2001 [Accessed 16th October 2011].

M&S Corporate Press Release, 2011. Online. February 7th. Available from: http://corporate.marksandspencer.com/page.aspx?pointerid=1c334d0e7c3f483ab62a0b7ad685ba54 [Accessed 15th October 2011].

Danica Ognjenovic, 1980. ‘Shop Within A Shop’. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 8 Issue: 2, p. 42 – 44.

Pearson, G. 1999. Pearson Education Limited.

Porter, M., 2006. ‘The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review. January. pp 23-41

Rayner, G. 2008. ‘Financial crisis: Marks & Spencer to announce drop in sales as slump fears grow.’ The Telegraph. October 1st 2008. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/3116808/Financial-crisis-Marks-and-Spencer-to-announcedrop-in-sales-as-slump-fears-grow.html [Accessed 16th October 2011].

Appendix

Three Frameworks for Analysis

The choice of available frameworks is extensive. This assignment does not permit detailed reviews of each, therefore a short summary of three is given below:

 

Porter’s Four Corners Model
Drivers; Management Assumptions; Strategy; Capability

This is a predictive tool that helps to anticipate a competitor’s plan of action. It is unusual because it strives to go beyond the competitor’s capacity and strategy, in order to identify likely motivation (based on internal value systems and company culture). The overriding goal is to anticipate a competitor’s response to a given set of circumstances.

‘The purpose of Four Corners Analysis is to predict future moves of your competitors based on your own strategic moves.’ (Evans, pp11-12)

 

Porter’s Five Forces
Bargaining Power Of Suppliers; Bargaining Power Of Customers; Threat Of New Entrants; Threat Of Substitute Products; Competitive Rivalry Within An Industry

Developed as a reaction to the SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) the five forces’ model includes three external forces and two internal ones that are used in combination to define this framework for analysing a business or industry. The forces are the threats posed by the entry into the market of new competitors, substitute services or products, the intensity of the competition and finally the bargaining power of both supplier and customers (Porter, 2006).

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Porters_five_forces.PNG

 

Six Forces Model
Competition; New entrants; End users/Buyers; Suppliers; Substitutes; Complementary products/ The  government/ The public

Academics and business strategists have challenged Porter’s five forces’ model because some of the assumptions made about competitors, suppliers, buyers and the level of certainty in the market were deemed to be doubtful. The sixth force added in this model is that of intervention by the government or the public, or ‘complementors’. (Brandenburger and Nalebuff, as reported in Burdett, 2011.)

Other frameworks include:
• Value Chain
• Delta Model
• National Diamond
• Industry Classification
• Nonmarket Forces

 

Appendix

Brief Company History

In 1884 Michael Marks opened a stall at a ‘penny bazaar’ – Leeds Kirkgate Market. In partnership with Tom Spencer they steadily expanded the business. Marks and Spencer (M&S) created a philosophy in relation to their business that was founded on close-knit family ties – the board comprised family members only, a situation that was sustained until the late 1970s. Sales staff benefited from good terms and conditions. Both original partners had died by the end of 1907, and a new generation of family members had taken over.

In the 1930s cafés were introduced, providing nutritious food at a reasonable price. In 1931 M&S introduced a food department that sold tinned goods and other produce. The company continued its policy of good treatment to employees and by 1933 pensions and subsidised canteens had been added. In 1934 the first research laboratory owned by any British retailer was set up by M&S, allowing the company to test new fabrics, and from 1939 until 1945 one of its scientists was chosen to help develop the government’s wartime Utility Clothing Scheme.

In the late 1940s M&S opened the first self-service shop in London, which was an enormous success. By 1973 wine was sold for the first time and the following year Chinese and Indian dishes were added. In 1975, European outlets were established in Belgium and Paris. During the 1980s, M&S brought in the chargecard scheme, added furniture to the goods it sold and opened its first Hong Kong stores.

The 1990s brought many changes: in 1998, when Sir Richard Greenbury was Chairman, M&S became the first British retailer to make a pre-tax profit of over £1 billion; online shopping was introduced in 1999 and the same year the company published a code of practice designed to improve working conditions for employees of overseas suppliers. In 2000 M&S received ‘Millennium Product’ status for 12 different products and Luc Vandevelde became Chairman and Chief Executive.
Source: Marks and Spencer website.

Tags: ,

Category: Business Essay Examples, Essay & Dissertation Samples

Ask a question about this article

You must be logged in to post a comment.